Professor Lawrence E. Susskind
TEACHING and RESEARCH KEY INTELLECTUAL CONTRIBUTIONS TRAINING and PRACTICE
BIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY
Key Intellectual Contributions











Professor Susskind’s primary contributions to the fields of urban and environmental planning, negotiation and dispute resolution, and mutlilateral treaty negotiation are highlighted below. He is the originator of twelve key ideas that have shaped theory and practice in the United States and elsewhere around the world.


Public Dispute Resolution

Traditional approaches to resolving public disputes produce results that are not as fair, efficient, stable, or wise as they could be. This is true in almost every democratic society. By supplementing representative democracy with new forms of stakeholder involvement -- facilitated by trained mediators -- better results can be achieved at the local, state, and national levels. This suggests new roles for planners, a new profession of public dispute mediation, and ways of strengthening mature democracies.

Links

top
Environmental Mediation

Environmental conflicts can often be resolved through mediated face-to-face negotiation. Environmental mediating raises a host of ethical issues. This is particularly true in the rule-making or regulatory context.

Links

top
Joint Fact Finding

Links

top
Facility Siting Credo

The “decide-announce-defend” approach to siting regionally necessary but locally noxious facilities no longer works. Only an approach that follows the steps outlined in the Facility Siting Credo is likely to overcome claims of environmental injustice and political unfairness.

Links

top
Public Entrepreneurship

New “greener” technologies will be needed to shift to more sustainable development patterns throughout the world. The diffusion of these technologies will not be easy because communities (rather than individual corporate or public leaders) will have to decide simultaneously to try them and ensure that they work. New public entrepreneurship networks (with public and private sector actors playing very different roles) will have to be created and maintained to ensure the implementation of these “greener” technologies.

Links

top
Mutual Gains Approach to Negotiation

So-called “win-win” approaches to negotiation have gained in popularity over the past two decades. There is actually no way, however, for everyone to get everything they want in most negotiations. So, building consensus in a way that ensures that all stakeholders exceed “their next best option if there is no agreement” is the key. Building on the work of Fisher and Ury at the Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School, Susskind has spelled out how to make a mutual gains approach to negotiation work, especially in multi-party contexts of all kinds.

Links

top
Interactive Representation

Most parliaments and legislatures are comprised of representatives elected on a district basis (by majority rule). As with the United States Congress, this heightens party politics, leads to enormous instability in policy priorities, and usually ensures that “good policy is not good politics.” A new system of Interactive Representation that shifts away from geography and toward shared interests as the basis for elections and emphasizes proportionality rather than majority rule would produce far better policy.

Links

  • Can America's Democracy Be Improved? (with Liora Zion) Draft Working Paper of the Consensus Building Institute and the MIT-Harvard Public Disputes Program, August 2002 (PDF)
  • The Cure for Our Broken Political Process: How We Can Get Our Politicians to Stop Fighting and Start Resolving the Issues that Truly Matter, with Sol Erdman, (Potomac Publishers) forthcoming 2008.
top
The Mediation of Land Use Disputes

Most land use and growth management conflicts (particularly at the state and local levels) can be mediated as long as the right kind of “homework” is done beforehand and certain modifications in traditional institutional arrangements are worked out.

Links

top
Management of Sustainable Development

Sustainable development (i.e. patterns of growth and resource consumption that leave “good” options open to future generations) is an elusive goal. Only by treating the goals and methods of sustainable development as “negotiable” can they be achieved. Balancing economic, ecological, cultural and political objectives requires institutional capacity building and more effective management strategies, particularly in the developing world.

Links

top
Using Simulations As a Teaching Tool

Too much teaching and training is purely didactic. At every level – from grade school through the most advanced professional training – simulations can and should be used to supplement traditional educational techniques. Simulations (unlike unstructured role plays or case studies) put learners in carefully structured situations that build in real-life constraints. Simultaneous debriefing of multiple groups using the same simulations generate powerful lessons.

Links

top
Global Environmental Treaty-making: Parallel Informal Negotiation

The global environmental treaty-making system is flawed. While hundreds of multilateral accords have been adopted, implementation (as with the Climate Change convention) has been difficult. A new approach to generating transboundary agreements -- called Parallel Informal Negotiation-- ensures much more than lowest common denominator agreements and increases the chances of effective implementation.

Links

top
Joint Training As a Dispute Resolution Tool

As a prelude to negotiation, it is often helpful to bring together the parties for a period of joint training. By introducing the actual parties to the mutual gains approach to negotiation (and ensuring that their constituencies also understand what is involved), it is possible to minimize the adversary nature of contract and other kinds of negotiations.

Links

  • Training as Organizational Development (currently not available)
  • Implementing a Mutual Gains Approach to Collective Bargaining, (With Elaine Landry). In Negotiation Journal, January, 1991, pp 5-10.
top