Professor Susskinds primary contributions to the fields of urban
and environmental planning, negotiation and dispute resolution, and mutlilateral
treaty negotiation are highlighted below. He is the originator of twelve
key ideas that have shaped theory and practice in the United States and
elsewhere around the world.
Public Dispute Resolution |
Traditional approaches to resolving public disputes produce
results that are not as fair, efficient, stable, or wise as they
could be. This is true in almost every democratic society. By
supplementing representative democracy with new forms of stakeholder
involvement -- facilitated by trained mediators -- better results
can be achieved at the local, state, and national levels. This
suggests new roles for planners, a new profession of public dispute
mediation, and ways of strengthening mature democracies.
Links
|
top
|
| Environmental Mediation |
Environmental conflicts can often be resolved through mediated face-to-face negotiation. Environmental mediating raises a host of ethical issues. This is particularly true
in the rule-making or regulatory context.
Links
|
top
|
| Joint Fact Finding
|
Links |
top
|
| Facility Siting Credo
|
The decide-announce-defend approach to siting regionally
necessary but locally noxious facilities no longer works. Only
an approach that follows the steps outlined in the Facility Siting
Credo is likely to overcome claims of environmental injustice
and political unfairness.
Links
|
top
|
| Public Entrepreneurship |
New greener technologies will be needed to shift
to more sustainable development patterns throughout the world.
The diffusion of these technologies will not be easy because communities
(rather than individual corporate or public leaders) will have
to decide simultaneously to try them and ensure that they work.
New public entrepreneurship networks (with public and private
sector actors playing very different roles) will have to be created
and maintained to ensure the implementation of these greener
technologies.
Links
|
top
|
| Mutual Gains Approach
to Negotiation |
So-called win-win approaches to negotiation have
gained in popularity over the past two decades. There is actually
no way, however, for everyone to get everything they want in most
negotiations. So, building consensus in a way that ensures that
all stakeholders exceed their next best option if there
is no agreement is the key. Building on the work of Fisher
and Ury at the Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School, Susskind
has spelled out how to make a mutual gains approach to negotiation
work, especially in multi-party contexts of all kinds.
Links
|
top
|
| Interactive Representation |
Most parliaments and legislatures are comprised of representatives
elected on a district basis (by majority rule). As with the United
States Congress, this heightens party politics, leads to enormous
instability in policy priorities, and usually ensures that good
policy is not good politics. A new system of Interactive
Representation that shifts away from geography and toward shared
interests as the basis for elections and emphasizes proportionality
rather than majority rule would produce far better policy.
Links
- Can America's Democracy Be Improved? (with Liora
Zion) Draft Working Paper of the Consensus
Building Institute and the MIT-Harvard
Public Disputes Program, August 2002 (PDF)
- The Cure for Our Broken Political Process: How We Can Get Our
Politicians to Stop Fighting and Start Resolving the Issues that Truly Matter,
with Sol Erdman,
(Potomac Publishers) forthcoming 2008.
|
top
|
| The Mediation of Land
Use Disputes |
Most land use and growth management conflicts (particularly
at the state and local levels) can be mediated as long as the
right kind of homework is done beforehand and certain
modifications in traditional institutional arrangements are worked
out.
Links
|
top
|
| Management of Sustainable
Development |
Sustainable development (i.e. patterns of growth and resource
consumption that leave good options open to future
generations) is an elusive goal. Only by treating the goals and
methods of sustainable development as negotiable can
they be achieved. Balancing economic, ecological, cultural and
political objectives requires institutional capacity building
and more effective management strategies, particularly in the
developing world.
Links
|
top
|
| Using Simulations As a
Teaching Tool |
Too much teaching and training is purely didactic. At every
level from grade school through the most advanced professional
training simulations can and should be used to supplement
traditional educational techniques. Simulations (unlike unstructured
role plays or case studies) put learners in carefully structured
situations that build in real-life constraints. Simultaneous debriefing
of multiple groups using the same simulations generate powerful
lessons.
Links
|
top
|
| Global Environmental
Treaty-making: Parallel Informal Negotiation |
The global environmental treaty-making system is flawed. While
hundreds of multilateral accords have been adopted, implementation
(as with the Climate Change convention) has been difficult. A
new approach to generating transboundary agreements -- called
Parallel Informal Negotiation-- ensures much more than lowest
common denominator agreements and increases the chances of effective
implementation.
Links
- Global Forum
on Trade, Environment and Development
- Multistakeholder Dialogue at the Global Scale (with
Boyd W. Fuller, Michéle Ferenz, David Fairman), International
Negotiation Journal, 8 (2).
- 11.364
International Environmental Negotiation (OpenCourseWare)
- Environmental Diplomacy: Negotiating More Effective Global Agreements
(Oxford University Press, 1994, in Japanese in 1995, and in Arabic in 1996)
- Papers on International Environmental Negotiation, Volume 16: Enhancing the Effectiveness of the Treaty-making System (2007)
- Papers on International Environmental Negotiation, Volume 15: Ensuring a Sustainable Future (2006)
|
top
|
| Joint Training As a Dispute
Resolution Tool |
As a prelude to negotiation, it is often helpful to bring together
the parties for a period of joint training. By introducing the
actual parties to the mutual gains approach to negotiation (and
ensuring that their constituencies also understand what is involved),
it is possible to minimize the adversary nature of contract and
other kinds of negotiations.
Links
- Training as Organizational Development (currently
not available)
- Implementing a Mutual Gains Approach to Collective Bargaining, (With Elaine Landry). In Negotiation Journal, January, 1991, pp 5-10.
|
| top |
|